Well, I am sorry to hear that. I didn't make assumptions based on "nothing", I made them based on you not responding to anything in this thread for over a week. If you had simply posted this a week ago, it wouldn't have been an issue.
Of course, trying to turn this around and make me out to be some sort of bad guy does say something about you, and it isn't something good.
If you think this thread is about keeping in touch with your voters, I'm afraid you don't understand how an election works. This thread should be about attracting more voters, and responding to questions from them. Here, let me re-post my totally legit questions from 9 days ago that I am still waiting for answers for:
Two step wrote:I'm confused by this whole thread. Firstly, you apparently don't have time to write a new post, yet you think you will have time to do all the work one would have to do on the CSM?
Secondly, you appear to think the election is decided by the number of your alliancemates who post meaningless "+1" posts in your thread. Do you perhaps think that sort of mindless agreement might turn off non-provibloc voters? I think you didn't actually understand why Ali Aras got elected last time, it wasn't pure Provibloc voters, it was because she actually ran a campaign and tried to appeal to people outside her natural voting block.
Thirdly, You have the crazy ideas on this page about not needing to tell potential voters about how you personally feel on various issues. While the CSM are not game designers, what the kind current CSM members are trying to tell you here is that they do have a lot of input into game design decisions, and they need to have opinions of their own.
Fourthly, you don't seem to be doing a great job of being a clear communicator. Can your voters expect posts full of "u" instead of "you", and lowercase i's when you are posting on the internal CSM-only forums? Do you think CCP will value that sort of communication as highly as someone who uses actual words and capital letters?
If you don't feel that is
worthy of a response(1), great. That tells me more than enough about the sort of candidate you are, and the sort of CSM delegate you might be.
There are also a couple of
reasonable other questions(2) from Elmnt80 and Abla Tive up above that you haven't replied to as well.